
Months later, legislation was passed that banned handguns over .22-caliber. In 1998, the ban was further extended to include smaller caliber handguns. Handgun owners who handed in their guns were fully compensated by the government. A September 1998 Evening News article said that the new rules required those applying for a gun to nominate two referees to testify in support of their having a license.
Not everyone was happy with the new firearm controls. According to an August 1998 article in The Birmingham Evening Mail, the handgun bans severely affected gun retailers, gun clubs and pistol shooting sports. Moreover, many gun advocates complained that a majority of gun related crimes involved weapons sold on the black market and rarely guns held by licensed owners.
Gill Marshall-Andrews of the Gun Control Network was quoted in Philip Johnstons July 2001 Daily Telegraph article stating that almost all illegal guns start out legal, so its not easy to draw a neat line between the two. Marshall-Andrews further suggested that the gun laws should remain tough in order to keep gun crime down. Yet, Johnston claimed that a study from the Center for Defense Studies in London found there to be no link between the legal possession of guns and their use by criminals and in the two years following the handgun ban crime actually increased by 40 per cent.
Since the study, the Dunblane gun laws were considered by many to be a failure. By summer 2004,



